Covestro Urethane Comments
Covestro AG (CVVTF) CEO Markus Steilemann on Q2 2021 Results – Earnings Call Transcript
Covestro AG (OTCPK:CVVTF) Q2 2021 Earnings Conference Call August 6, 2021 9:00 AM ET
Ronald Köhler – Investor Relations
Markus Steilemann – Chief Executive Officer
Thomas Toepfer – Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Ronald, and a very warm welcome to everyone on the phone from my side. Good day and good morning. The second quarter 2021 performance was well above previous year. Like in the first quarter, the prior year impacted by the coronavirus pandemic, hence we have a low basis for comparison.
The trend of a dynamic demand recovery and increasing product margins that started in 2020 in the second half is however continuing. We see strong earnings momentum to this day and well into the third quarter. In total the second quarter core volumes were 35% above previous year. The EBITDA of €817 million is in line with the second quarter guidance of €730 to €870 million and as pre-announced on July the 12th. We also have seen a very strong free operating cash flow of €374 million. After closing of the RFM acquisition on April 1, this business is now fully consolidated for the first time in Covestro numbers. We also further raised our earnings guidance for full-year 2021 as announced on July 12th.
With that we turn to the next page. The core volumes increased strongly against an exceptionally weak prior year, with peak of pandemic’s impact in Europe, North America, and parts of Asia. While demand rebound continued dynamically, the current quarter’s growth potential was limited by constrained product availability.
Let’s take a look at volume development by regions. On low comparable figures, strong volume rebound of 48% year on year in Europe. The actual volume growth was limited by constrained polyols availability. We see a similar picture in North America. Strong underlying demand growth of almost 38% year on year. The actual volume growth was also here limited by the constrained feedstock supply. The volume rebound in Asia Pacific came in at 22% year on year. In China, as you might remember, the first quarter 2020 had been a pandemic-related trough and the second quarter 2020 had already seen a demand recovery.
Now, let’s take a view on the volumes by an industry perspective. The ranking is by kilotons sold to specific industries. So we start with furniture, which was up 20% year-on-year driven by demand in Europe and North America. Construction was up 13% year on year globally driven by good demand in Europe as well as Asia Pacific, while North America growth was limited by supply constraints of MDI and polyols. In the automotive and transportation sector, we saw strong demand growth in all regions, plus 88% year on year.
Divers industries, here we also saw a strong increase of 55% year on year as the total RFM volumes have been allocated for first consolidation. Underlying volumes here grew at 14% year on year.
Let’s now turn on the next page and look at the first segment polyurethanes. The core volume growth of 27.8% year on year was driven by dynamic rebound of demand from all key customer industries compared to a week prior year. Based on preliminary industry data, MDI, as well as TDI industry demand, grew strongly, double-digit rates in Q1 and Q2 versus prior year and single-digit rates above pre-pandemic levels of 2019. Of all Covestro segments, however, PUR was most burdened by constrained product availability, mainly in the United States and Europe. Limited feedstock supply remained a key constraint for us to produce sufficient products to meet very strong underlying customer demand.
In the U.S. we meanwhile lifted force majeure for polyols on June 1, for TDI on July 1 as well as for some MDI grades on July 14. For MDI in Europe we declared force majeure on July 2 due to an unforeseen production issue beyond our control in Brunsbuttel, Germany. This is expected to last several weeks and to burden group core volume growth by several percentage points in the third quarter. Compared to prior year, EBITDA increased mainly due to a strong positive pricing delta in all three product groups. EBITDA margins of 24.6% are still well below historic peaks of 32.7%, which happened in the first quarter of 2018.
Yes. Thank you very much. Good afternoon, Markus, Thomas, Ronald, and everybody else on the call. Congrats on the results. Two questions from my side as a start. First of all, can you please share with us some more details on the Brunsbuttel force majeure? When could you envisage a restart there? And then second question, assuming that your cash flow generation continues as envisaged for the year and even beyond, can you remind us on your priorities on your uses of cash? In that context, what is your current thinking around the MDI plant in the U.S.? Thank you.
Now on your question on MDI, also nothing new to report. We will take a decision on that as we always said in the second half of the year. We’re currently in the second half, so you should expect the decision to be taken rather towards the end of this year, and we will then decide if and when to continue the MDI-500 investment. So I think that would be my comments on the use of cash, Christian. And then maybe over to Markus for the Brunsbuttel question.
Yes. Christian, this is Markus. Good to hear you. So on Brunsbuttel, the restart actually has just happened. However, we have to realize that volumes will stay constrained simply due to the low inventory levels and also additionally planned and required maintenance shutdowns in August. Therefore, the loss of volumes will continue for some time compared to normal operations and will burden our Q3 in terms of volume growth compared to previous year’s level. Again, a very strong comparison basis by several percentage points on a group level. However, all in all, let’s say, all these developments have been somewhat baked into the full-year guidance.
Thanks. Hi Markus, Thomas, Ronald. Just a couple from my end. And the first is, it’d be great to get your views on what you’re seeing at your customers in terms of their inventory levels, and maybe you can touch on your assumptions on whether we’re expecting potentially a big phase of customer restocking into the end of the year or maybe this might roll into the next. And then secondly, could you comment or even quantify the type of lead times your customers are experiencing and how that’s developed and maybe you can translate that to your order books going into this coming quarter? Thanks
Well, Daniel thanks for the question. I would like to take the first one and maybe then Thomas takes the second one. So overall, we see since mid of last year actually this growing momentum of customer demand and also with all the developments that we have just outlined to you a couple of minutes ago. That means, yes, we see that there is customers who try to maybe order more, some customers even panicking and try to stock material. However, they simply do not get their hands on the material. So given that some customers try to do that, given that they have not made so many let’s say positive experiences or were not simply able to get their hands around material, we think that current demand patterns are really reflecting the true demand that is out there. Or to put it better, we are still not able to supply all the demand that is out there, and that is also let’s say continuing well into the third quarter as we have outlined, because that is the main driver for the current momentum, this very strong demand across all of our industries and also across regions.
So having said that, we do not see that restocking or stock building plays a major role in the current overall trading environment. Whether this will change actually towards year-end, a big question mark because at least from our perspective and from today’s perspective, as far as we can let’s say see through our order books, the demand is still strong, the supply is still subdued, and from that perspective, it is very difficult to judge what will happen towards year end. The only region where we see let’s say a little bit more normalization in terms of supply and demand is in China. And therefore, we expect that in China, let’s say this tight situation at one point in time will normalize. So I hope that helps.
And with that, I would like to hand over to Thomas.
Yes. Maybe, Daniel to your second question; if I got it correctly, it was about the lead times of our customers. So the lead times that we’re seeing on average across all the products is about six to eight weeks and that is also the visibility that we have in terms of our sales and EBITDA development. Now that number is pretty much unchanged or has been unchanged over the last quarters, and therefore nothing really big has changed also in terms of our visibility. The only thing that is maybe worth highlighting is the automotive industry where I think we can clearly see and say that we are sold out until the end both for Europe but also for the U.S.
Now switching gears towards your statement around let’s say this assumed MDI-500 investment. I don’t know where actually you have caught let’s say that statement, but it’s very important to look at the MDI investment from a very general perspective, what opportunities do we have in very general terms. And that is not only related to the MDI investment. We have already opportunity to partially get access to renewable raw materials in the market. It could be used as a complete drop-in for, and when I mean complete, I mean in terms of specification, a complete drop-in for petrochemical-based raw materials. However, the availability of those raw materials is still rather limited. So we’re talking about a very, very low let’s say below 1% range that we would be able to currently actually get access to in the raw materials market. However, that availability is increasing, at least we’re expecting this availability to increase over the next years, and that would be then regardless of if we would build a new plant on MDI or we would just use it as a drop-in solution of sustainable raw materials for our existing plants, to be clear on that one.
And the second bit is, the second let’s say the different side of the same coin on renewable raw materials is renewable energy, and we need also renewable energy supply to make our overall operations more sustainable. And here we’re looking currently into each and every opportunity in different regions with the different let’s say characteristics of the respective energy supply markets. And I have to tell you it is not easy. It’s not necessarily only a matter of supply but also in terms of risk exposure and so on and so forth. So long story short, on renewable raw materials, no, it is not that. In case we would invest, and once again Thomas alluded to that, in MDI, this is not 100% based on renewable materials. And we have still the opportunity to go for new renewable materials in existing plants. However, the availability is still the limiting factor. And the second bit is we’re also looking into renewable energy for our entire operations, but that is also planned and we’re very diligently currently working on. But so far, no large update on that one.« Previous Post Next Post »