Company News

May 1, 2019

Olin Quarterly Results

Olin Announces First Quarter 2019 Earnings

30/04/2019 9:15pm

PR Newswire (US)

 

Olin (NYSE:OLN)
Intraday Stock Chart

Today : Wednesday 1 May 2019

Click Here for more Olin Charts.

CLAYTON, Mo., April 30, 2019 /PRNewswire/ —

First Quarter 2019 Highlights

  • Net income of $41.7 million and adjusted EBITDA of $270.1 million
  • Reiterated full year 2019 adjusted EBITDA forecast of $1.265 billion

Olin Corporation (NYSE: OLN) announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2019.

First quarter 2019 reported net income was $41.7 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, which compares to first quarter 2018 reported net income of $20.9 million, or $0.12 per diluted share.  First quarter 2019 adjusted EBITDA of $270.1 million excludes depreciation and amortization expense of $152.9 million, restructuring charges of $4.0 million, information technology integration costs of $14.1 million and a pretax gain on the sale of an investment in a non-consolidated affiliate of $11.2 million.  First quarter 2018 adjusted EBITDA was $240.3 million.  Sales in the first quarter 2019 were $1,553.4 million compared to $1,710.3 million in the first quarter 2018.

John E. Fischer, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, said, “Olin achieved the highest first quarter adjusted EBITDA since the 2015 acquisition of Dow’s U.S. chlor alkali and vinyls, global chlorinated organics and global epoxy business.  This level of adjusted EBITDA was reached despite several challenges during the first quarter, including ongoing weakness in caustic soda pricing, a later-than-normal seasonal rebound in epoxy and merchant chlorine demand, and shipping disruptions associated with the closure of the Houston Ship Channel in late March.”

OUTLOOK

During the first quarter, caustic soda pricing in Olin’s system declined by approximately 9% from the fourth quarter 2018 levels.  At present, caustic soda pricing appears to be nearing a bottom, and Olin expects caustic soda pricing to begin to improve as the second quarter progresses.  Olin also expects further recovery of caustic soda pricing during the second half of 2019.  Olin continued to experience improvement in pricing for chlorine, ethylene dichloride and other chlorine-derivatives in the first quarter and anticipates positive supply and demand fundamentals for chlorine and chlorine-derivatives to continue through the balance of 2019.  We believe the favorable structural conditions in the chlor alkali industry resulting from expected demand and supply dynamics remain in place.  The Company remains confident in the long-term positive outlook for our Chlor Alkali Products and Vinyls business.

First quarter 2019 epoxy resin volumes increased sequentially from the fourth quarter of 2018 as customer inventory destocking eased, but were lower year-over-year due to lower end-use demand from automotive-related customers and Asian customers.  The Company experienced sequentially lower raw material costs, primarily benzene and propylene, which were offset by lower product pricing.  The long-term supply and demand fundamentals for the Epoxy business also remain positive.  The combination of expected steady global demand growth and minimal capacity additions in the industry support a favorable long-term Epoxy business outlook.

“During the second quarter, Olin expects caustic soda pricing in our system to decline from the first quarter levels.  As a result of the lower caustic soda pricing and sequentially higher planned maintenance turnaround costs, Olin expects second quarter 2019 adjusted EBITDA to be lower than the first quarter.  Olin also expects second half 2019 adjusted EBITDA to be stronger than the first half.  While Olin continues to expect 2019 adjusted EBITDA to be comparable to 2018 levels, we now believe that there is more downside risk than upside opportunity for the full year.  During 2019, we will continue to focus on achieving our debt reduction targets, while investing in our businesses, and returning cash to our shareholders to create long-term value,” Fischer continued.

SEGMENT REPORTING

Olin defines segment earnings as income (loss) before interest expense, interest income, other operating income (expense), non-operating pension income, other income, and income taxes and includes the (losses) earnings of non-consolidated affiliates in segment results consistent with management’s monitoring of the operating segments.

CHLOR ALKALI PRODUCTS AND VINYLS

Chlor Alkali Products and Vinyls sales for the first quarter 2019 were $872.2 million compared to $936.1 million in the first quarter 2018.  First quarter 2019 segment earnings were $120.4 million compared to $130.5 million in the first quarter 2018.  The decreases in the first quarter sales and segment earnings compared to the prior year were primarily due to decreased caustic soda pricing, partially offset by higher chlorine, ethylene dichloride, and other chlorine-derivative pricing.  The lower segment earnings compared to prior year also included higher ethylene costs, due to increased ethane prices, which were more than offset by lower electricity costs and lower maintenance turnaround costs.  Chlor Alkali Products and Vinyls first quarter 2019 results included depreciation and amortization expense of $119.8 million compared to $113.7 million in the first quarter 2018.

EPOXY

Epoxy sales for the first quarter 2019 were $524.0 million compared to $603.3 million in the first quarter 2018.  The decrease in Epoxy sales was primarily due to lower cumene volumes and lower product prices.  The first quarter 2019 segment income was $10.5 million compared to a segment loss of $22.1 million in the first quarter 2018.  The increase in Epoxy segment earnings was primarily due to lower planned maintenance turnaround costs.  The first quarter 2018 Epoxy segment earnings reflected $44.7 million of maintenance costs and unabsorbed fixed manufacturing costs from lower production associated with an approximate two-month planned maintenance turnaround at our production facilities in Freeport, Texas.  The first quarter 2019 Epoxy segment earnings also included lower product prices, offset by lower raw material costs, primarily benzene and propylene, compared to last year.  Epoxy first quarter 2019 results included depreciation and amortization expense of $26.5 million compared to $26.7 million in the first quarter 2018.

https://uk.advfn.com/stock-market/NYSE/OLN/share-news/Olin-Announces-First-Quarter-2019-Earnings/79802257

May 1, 2019

Olin Quarterly Results

Olin Announces First Quarter 2019 Earnings

30/04/2019 9:15pm

PR Newswire (US)

 

Olin (NYSE:OLN)
Intraday Stock Chart

Today : Wednesday 1 May 2019

Click Here for more Olin Charts.

CLAYTON, Mo., April 30, 2019 /PRNewswire/ —

First Quarter 2019 Highlights

  • Net income of $41.7 million and adjusted EBITDA of $270.1 million
  • Reiterated full year 2019 adjusted EBITDA forecast of $1.265 billion

Olin Corporation (NYSE: OLN) announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2019.

First quarter 2019 reported net income was $41.7 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, which compares to first quarter 2018 reported net income of $20.9 million, or $0.12 per diluted share.  First quarter 2019 adjusted EBITDA of $270.1 million excludes depreciation and amortization expense of $152.9 million, restructuring charges of $4.0 million, information technology integration costs of $14.1 million and a pretax gain on the sale of an investment in a non-consolidated affiliate of $11.2 million.  First quarter 2018 adjusted EBITDA was $240.3 million.  Sales in the first quarter 2019 were $1,553.4 million compared to $1,710.3 million in the first quarter 2018.

John E. Fischer, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, said, “Olin achieved the highest first quarter adjusted EBITDA since the 2015 acquisition of Dow’s U.S. chlor alkali and vinyls, global chlorinated organics and global epoxy business.  This level of adjusted EBITDA was reached despite several challenges during the first quarter, including ongoing weakness in caustic soda pricing, a later-than-normal seasonal rebound in epoxy and merchant chlorine demand, and shipping disruptions associated with the closure of the Houston Ship Channel in late March.”

OUTLOOK

During the first quarter, caustic soda pricing in Olin’s system declined by approximately 9% from the fourth quarter 2018 levels.  At present, caustic soda pricing appears to be nearing a bottom, and Olin expects caustic soda pricing to begin to improve as the second quarter progresses.  Olin also expects further recovery of caustic soda pricing during the second half of 2019.  Olin continued to experience improvement in pricing for chlorine, ethylene dichloride and other chlorine-derivatives in the first quarter and anticipates positive supply and demand fundamentals for chlorine and chlorine-derivatives to continue through the balance of 2019.  We believe the favorable structural conditions in the chlor alkali industry resulting from expected demand and supply dynamics remain in place.  The Company remains confident in the long-term positive outlook for our Chlor Alkali Products and Vinyls business.

First quarter 2019 epoxy resin volumes increased sequentially from the fourth quarter of 2018 as customer inventory destocking eased, but were lower year-over-year due to lower end-use demand from automotive-related customers and Asian customers.  The Company experienced sequentially lower raw material costs, primarily benzene and propylene, which were offset by lower product pricing.  The long-term supply and demand fundamentals for the Epoxy business also remain positive.  The combination of expected steady global demand growth and minimal capacity additions in the industry support a favorable long-term Epoxy business outlook.

“During the second quarter, Olin expects caustic soda pricing in our system to decline from the first quarter levels.  As a result of the lower caustic soda pricing and sequentially higher planned maintenance turnaround costs, Olin expects second quarter 2019 adjusted EBITDA to be lower than the first quarter.  Olin also expects second half 2019 adjusted EBITDA to be stronger than the first half.  While Olin continues to expect 2019 adjusted EBITDA to be comparable to 2018 levels, we now believe that there is more downside risk than upside opportunity for the full year.  During 2019, we will continue to focus on achieving our debt reduction targets, while investing in our businesses, and returning cash to our shareholders to create long-term value,” Fischer continued.

SEGMENT REPORTING

Olin defines segment earnings as income (loss) before interest expense, interest income, other operating income (expense), non-operating pension income, other income, and income taxes and includes the (losses) earnings of non-consolidated affiliates in segment results consistent with management’s monitoring of the operating segments.

CHLOR ALKALI PRODUCTS AND VINYLS

Chlor Alkali Products and Vinyls sales for the first quarter 2019 were $872.2 million compared to $936.1 million in the first quarter 2018.  First quarter 2019 segment earnings were $120.4 million compared to $130.5 million in the first quarter 2018.  The decreases in the first quarter sales and segment earnings compared to the prior year were primarily due to decreased caustic soda pricing, partially offset by higher chlorine, ethylene dichloride, and other chlorine-derivative pricing.  The lower segment earnings compared to prior year also included higher ethylene costs, due to increased ethane prices, which were more than offset by lower electricity costs and lower maintenance turnaround costs.  Chlor Alkali Products and Vinyls first quarter 2019 results included depreciation and amortization expense of $119.8 million compared to $113.7 million in the first quarter 2018.

EPOXY

Epoxy sales for the first quarter 2019 were $524.0 million compared to $603.3 million in the first quarter 2018.  The decrease in Epoxy sales was primarily due to lower cumene volumes and lower product prices.  The first quarter 2019 segment income was $10.5 million compared to a segment loss of $22.1 million in the first quarter 2018.  The increase in Epoxy segment earnings was primarily due to lower planned maintenance turnaround costs.  The first quarter 2018 Epoxy segment earnings reflected $44.7 million of maintenance costs and unabsorbed fixed manufacturing costs from lower production associated with an approximate two-month planned maintenance turnaround at our production facilities in Freeport, Texas.  The first quarter 2019 Epoxy segment earnings also included lower product prices, offset by lower raw material costs, primarily benzene and propylene, compared to last year.  Epoxy first quarter 2019 results included depreciation and amortization expense of $26.5 million compared to $26.7 million in the first quarter 2018.

https://uk.advfn.com/stock-market/NYSE/OLN/share-news/Olin-Announces-First-Quarter-2019-Earnings/79802257

May 1, 2019

More Huntsman Analysis

Low chemical prices drag Huntsman’s profits

Updated

Lower sales volumes and prices slashed profits for The Woodlands-based chemical maker Huntsman Corp. in the first quarter.

The petrochemical manufacturer net income attributable to its company dove to $119  million from $274 million in the same quarter last year – a 56 percent drop. Its revenue slid to $2 billion from $2.3 billion in the same quarter last year.

Prices for the chemical methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) – which is used primarily in the production of rigid polyurethane foams used for insulation for homes and refrigerators — fell sharply particularly in Europe and China. Those lower prices didn’t offset increased MDI production due to the startup of a new MDI plant in China and the acquisition of the North American spray polyurethane foam manufacturer Demilec in the second quarter of 2018.

Prices for the chemical compound MTBE, used as a blending component in gasoline outside of the U.S., also dropped on the back of lower prices for high octane gasoline, the company said.

Huntsman also suffered from lower prices and sales revenue due to weak market conditions in its performance products division, which produces specialist chemicals used in agriculture, cleaning, adhesives, sealants, plastics, refineries, oilfields and thousands of other uses. The company’s textile chemicals sectors and advance materials sector suffered similar fate with weak pricing.

“While global economic conditions remained challenging in the first quarter of this year, we are pleased with the relative resilience of our core downstream portfolio. The month of March ended slightly better than we projected, and while we remain cautious of certain regions of the world, notably Europe, we see momentum returning to Asia, especially in China,” Peter R. Huntsman, Chairman, President and CEO, in a statement.

Despite the lackluster first quarter results, Huntsman’s CEO said the company is on track to achieve its second best year ever  and remains “focused on delivering consistent strong free cash flow and executing our downstream strategy through strategic investments, new products and continued globalization of recent bolt-on acquisitions. ”

Chris Muir, an analyst with  the investment firm CFRA Research, in a note to clients said he was reducing his outlook for how much the company would make in 2019.

“We see some signs of momentum returning to Asian markets, but slower growth in HUN’s European markets. However, we continue to see lower pricing in 2019 pressuring results.”Muir wrote.

https://www.mrt.com/business/energy/article/Low-chemical-prices-drag-Huntsman-s-profits-13806769.php

May 1, 2019

More Huntsman Analysis

Low chemical prices drag Huntsman’s profits

Updated

Lower sales volumes and prices slashed profits for The Woodlands-based chemical maker Huntsman Corp. in the first quarter.

The petrochemical manufacturer net income attributable to its company dove to $119  million from $274 million in the same quarter last year – a 56 percent drop. Its revenue slid to $2 billion from $2.3 billion in the same quarter last year.

Prices for the chemical methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) – which is used primarily in the production of rigid polyurethane foams used for insulation for homes and refrigerators — fell sharply particularly in Europe and China. Those lower prices didn’t offset increased MDI production due to the startup of a new MDI plant in China and the acquisition of the North American spray polyurethane foam manufacturer Demilec in the second quarter of 2018.

Prices for the chemical compound MTBE, used as a blending component in gasoline outside of the U.S., also dropped on the back of lower prices for high octane gasoline, the company said.

Huntsman also suffered from lower prices and sales revenue due to weak market conditions in its performance products division, which produces specialist chemicals used in agriculture, cleaning, adhesives, sealants, plastics, refineries, oilfields and thousands of other uses. The company’s textile chemicals sectors and advance materials sector suffered similar fate with weak pricing.

“While global economic conditions remained challenging in the first quarter of this year, we are pleased with the relative resilience of our core downstream portfolio. The month of March ended slightly better than we projected, and while we remain cautious of certain regions of the world, notably Europe, we see momentum returning to Asia, especially in China,” Peter R. Huntsman, Chairman, President and CEO, in a statement.

Despite the lackluster first quarter results, Huntsman’s CEO said the company is on track to achieve its second best year ever  and remains “focused on delivering consistent strong free cash flow and executing our downstream strategy through strategic investments, new products and continued globalization of recent bolt-on acquisitions. ”

Chris Muir, an analyst with  the investment firm CFRA Research, in a note to clients said he was reducing his outlook for how much the company would make in 2019.

“We see some signs of momentum returning to Asian markets, but slower growth in HUN’s European markets. However, we continue to see lower pricing in 2019 pressuring results.”Muir wrote.

https://www.mrt.com/business/energy/article/Low-chemical-prices-drag-Huntsman-s-profits-13806769.php

April 30, 2019

Mattress Firm

Mattress Firm’s relationship with major supplier likely cost Stagner his job

Steve Stagner’s rocky relationship with one of Mattress Firm’s biggest and most lucrative suppliers likely cost the former chairman and chief executive his job at the helm of the nation’s largest mattress retailer, industry analysts said Wednesday.

Stagner, whose resignation was announced by Mattress Firm Tuesday evening, was the “last remaining hurdle” keeping Tempur Sealy from inking a deal with Mattress Firm to sell high-end Tempur-Pedic sleep systems through the Houston company’s 2,500 stores nationwide, said Peter Keith, a senior research analyst with Minneapolis-based investment firm Piper Jaffray & Co.

“The best way for Mattress Firm to improve its profitability is to bring back Tempur-Pedic, and if that meant a CEO change, I suspect the board and certainly the company’s ownership group would do it,” Keith said. “The economics make too much sense.”

It was not clear when Stagner would leave the company, and he did not return calls seeking comment. Mattress Firm, which launched a search for a new chief executive, has not yet announced an interim chief executive ahead of Memorial Day, a busy holiday sales season for mattress retailers.

Tempur Sealy declined to comment.

In an emailed statement, Mattress Firm said Stagner, who was chief executive from February 2010 and March 2016, was reappointed to the position in January 2018 to get the financially beleaguered retailer to a place where it has “good forward momentum.” Mattress Firm filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in October and emerged in November with 700 fewer stores.

“Mattress Firm is poised to capitalize on exciting new opportunities and build on the foundation of growth with new leadership,” Mattress Firm spokeswoman Sunni Goodman said in an email. “While our leadership teams are continuing conversations with Tempur Sealy, there is nothing more to report.”

Market responds

Tempur Sealy’s stock on Wednesday shot up more than 7 percent to $63.66 per share, soaring to a 15-month high, on speculation that the Kentucky manufacturer would renew its partnership with Mattress Firm now that Stagner has resigned.

Keith, the Piper Jaffray analyst, said there is a more than 90 percent probability that Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm would reconcile their differences after Stagner’s resignation, adding that he expected the renewed partnership would result in an additional $75 million in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for Tempur Sealy.

“We believe trust and durability of the relationship was the final hurdle, but these criteria would be hard to meet with Steve Stagner as CEO given his tenure during the period when the (Tempur Sealy – Mattress Firm) relationship deteriorated and ultimately blew up in what can only be described as an irrational and emotionally charged fallout because it made no economic sense for either party,” Keith said in a research note to clients.

Seth Basham, an analyst with Wedbush Securites based in Los Angeles, said he viewed Stagner’s resignation as a “positive development” for Tempur Sealy, given his “rocky relationship” with the supplier’s leadership.

“With Mr. Stagner’s resignation, the probably of (Tempur Sealy) rekindling its distribution relationship with (Mattress Firm) rises,” Basham said in a research note to clients. He suggested that a renewed relationship could be worth as much as $100 million in EBITDA to Tempur Sealy.

Dramatic turnaround

The potential re-marriage between Mattress Firm and Tempur Sealy, one of the nation’s largest mattress manufacturers, would be a stunning about-face from their acrimonious separation, stemming from a contract dispute in 2017 that led to the two bedding heavyweights duking it out in court over accusations of breach of contract and trademark infringement.

Stagner was the chairman of Mattress Firm in January 2017 when the company sought significant economic concessions from Tempur Sealy, which had supplied high-end mattresses to the retailer for more than a decade. Tempur Sealy executives balked and walked away from Mattress Firm a month later, leaving the retailer without a compelling alternative to Tempur-Pedic in the high-end mattress segment.

“Mattress Firm took strong-arm tactics to the negotiation table, and it completely backfired on them,” Keith said. “The termination hurt both companies, but it clearly hurt Mattress Firm more because it ended up in bankruptcy.”

After Mattress Firm emerged from bankruptcy in November 2018, the retailer approached Tempur Sealy’s leadership, looking to negotiate a deal. The companies agreed in February to drop all lawsuits against each other, and have since been in talks.

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/article/Mattress-Firm-s-relationship-with-major-13758022.php