Current Affairs

June 17, 2020

Homebuilder Sentiment Improves

Homebuilder sentiment posts biggest monthly surge ever, a sign housing is rebounding from coronavirus

Key Points
  • Builder sentiment jumped a striking 21 points in June to 58, the largest monthly increase ever in the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index.
  • Any reading above 50 indicates a positive market. In April, it plunged a record 42 points to 30.
  • Of the index’s three components, current sales conditions jumped 21 points to 63. Sales expectations in the next six months rose 22 points to 68. Buyer traffic more than doubled from May to June, from 22 to 43.

 

A faster-than-expected turnaround in homebuyer demand, following a sharp drop-off at the start of the coronavirus pandemic, has the nation’s homebuilders bullish on their business again.

Builder sentiment jumped a striking 21 points in June to 58, the largest monthly increase ever in the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index. Any reading above 50 indicates a positive market. In April, it plunged a record 42 points to 30.

“As the nation reopens, housing is well-positioned to lead the economy forward,” said NAHB Chairman Dean Mon, a homebuilder and developer from Shrewsbury, New Jersey. “Inventory is tight, mortgage applications are increasing, interest rates are low and confidence is rising.”

Meanwhile, mortgage applications to purchase a newly built home jumped 10.9% annually in May, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Of the homebuilder index’s three components, current sales conditions jumped 21 points to 63. Sales expectations in the next six months rose 22 points to 68. Buyer traffic more than doubled from May to June, from 22 to 43. This last component was surprising, given how many builders reported more online inquiries and virtual tours during the pandemic.

This report comes on the heels of a better-than-expected quarterly earnings report from one of the nation’s largest public homebuilders, Lennar. Chairman Stuart Miller said the company had stopped its new home starts and stopped purchasing land in March, only to have to reverse course unexpectedly.

“So we know that as we get to the fourth quarter we’re going to be a little short on our closings, but nonetheless, we rebooted pretty quickly as the market started showing signs of recovery in housing,” he said. “I think there will be a little bit of a pause in our numbers, but it will come back very quickly.”

Miller also indicated that the stories of urban flight are real, as people are rethinking the way they want to live in an age of lockdowns and work-from-home orders. That trend appears to be playing out among all the builders.

“Builders report increasing demand for families seeking single-family homes in inner and outer suburbs that feature lower density neighborhoods,” said NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz. “At the same time, elevated unemployment and the risk of new, local virus outbreaks remain a risk to the housing market.”

Regionally, builder sentiment in the Northeast surged 31 points to 48, and 20 points to 62 in the South. In the Midwest it rose 19 points to 51, and in the West it rose 22 points to 66.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/16/coronavirus-update-homebuilder-sentiment-posts-biggest-monthly-surge-ever.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

June 17, 2020

Homebuilder Sentiment Improves

Homebuilder sentiment posts biggest monthly surge ever, a sign housing is rebounding from coronavirus

Key Points
  • Builder sentiment jumped a striking 21 points in June to 58, the largest monthly increase ever in the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index.
  • Any reading above 50 indicates a positive market. In April, it plunged a record 42 points to 30.
  • Of the index’s three components, current sales conditions jumped 21 points to 63. Sales expectations in the next six months rose 22 points to 68. Buyer traffic more than doubled from May to June, from 22 to 43.

 

A faster-than-expected turnaround in homebuyer demand, following a sharp drop-off at the start of the coronavirus pandemic, has the nation’s homebuilders bullish on their business again.

Builder sentiment jumped a striking 21 points in June to 58, the largest monthly increase ever in the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index. Any reading above 50 indicates a positive market. In April, it plunged a record 42 points to 30.

“As the nation reopens, housing is well-positioned to lead the economy forward,” said NAHB Chairman Dean Mon, a homebuilder and developer from Shrewsbury, New Jersey. “Inventory is tight, mortgage applications are increasing, interest rates are low and confidence is rising.”

Meanwhile, mortgage applications to purchase a newly built home jumped 10.9% annually in May, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Of the homebuilder index’s three components, current sales conditions jumped 21 points to 63. Sales expectations in the next six months rose 22 points to 68. Buyer traffic more than doubled from May to June, from 22 to 43. This last component was surprising, given how many builders reported more online inquiries and virtual tours during the pandemic.

This report comes on the heels of a better-than-expected quarterly earnings report from one of the nation’s largest public homebuilders, Lennar. Chairman Stuart Miller said the company had stopped its new home starts and stopped purchasing land in March, only to have to reverse course unexpectedly.

“So we know that as we get to the fourth quarter we’re going to be a little short on our closings, but nonetheless, we rebooted pretty quickly as the market started showing signs of recovery in housing,” he said. “I think there will be a little bit of a pause in our numbers, but it will come back very quickly.”

Miller also indicated that the stories of urban flight are real, as people are rethinking the way they want to live in an age of lockdowns and work-from-home orders. That trend appears to be playing out among all the builders.

“Builders report increasing demand for families seeking single-family homes in inner and outer suburbs that feature lower density neighborhoods,” said NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz. “At the same time, elevated unemployment and the risk of new, local virus outbreaks remain a risk to the housing market.”

Regionally, builder sentiment in the Northeast surged 31 points to 48, and 20 points to 62 in the South. In the Midwest it rose 19 points to 51, and in the West it rose 22 points to 66.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/16/coronavirus-update-homebuilder-sentiment-posts-biggest-monthly-surge-ever.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

June 17, 2020

Tax Migration

Progressive Tax States Lose People, Income To Flat And Zero Income Tax States

Submitted by Ted Dabrowski and John Klingner via Wirepoints.org,

Flat and no-income tax states, as a group, are beating out progressive tax states in the contest for people and their incomes, according to the last decade of IRS migration data analyzed by Wirepoints.

The nation’s seventeen flat and no income tax states won a net 1.9 million residents and $120 billion in Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) from progressive tax states during the 2000-2018 period. That’s nearly a 4 percent AGI gain for the flat and no income tax states, based on their 2010 base of $3.3 trillion in AGI. A table with the individual winners and losers over the time period is provided below.

The net gains in AGI not only bolster the tax base the year in which they come in, but they also help all subsequent years. The gains pile up on top of each other, year after year.

That means the country’s flat and zero income tax states, as a group, have accumulated $490 billion in AGI since 2010 from the nation’s progressive tax states, adding vibrancy, investment and tax revenues to the winning states.

States don’t change their income tax schemes often, so when they do, it’s a big deal. The change pits those who favor progressive taxes against those who want a flat tax or no income tax at all. Eight states don’t tax income at all in the U.S., while ten states have flat income taxes. Thirty-two states have some form of a progressive tax scheme.

Connecticut was the last state to move to a progressive tax structure in 1996, while North Carolina (2013) and Kentucky (2018) changed to a flat tax more recently.

Now some Illinois politicians want to abandon the state’s flat tax in favor of a progressive income tax. They argue, among other things, that higher taxes will bring more stability and people to the state.

But the movement of people and wealth across the country tells a different story.

The accumulated pattern over the past nine years is pretty clear. People are moving from progressive tax states to flat and zero income tax states. Of course, people move for a whole host of other reasons beside taxes: jobs, housing, family, weather, retirement, corruption, etc. Taxes are only one reason. But for many people, they are a big one.

The wealth accumulation by the flat and zero-income tax states is all the more impressive considering there were just 17 such states (not including Kentucky) compared to 33 progressive tax states.

Total gains

The $120 billion total is the net transfer between the two groups of states. In terms of individual total wealth gained from migration, zero and flat income tax states make up seven of the top ten winners of net domestic migration.

Florida, a state with no income tax, has been the biggest winner by far. The Sunshine State has gained nearly a million net people and over $95 billion in AGI from other states since 2010.

Zero-tax Texas is up next with a gain of $31 billion in AGI, followed by North Carolina with $16 billion. Two progressive tax states, Arizona and South Carolina are next, then non-progressive Washington, Colorado, Nevada and Tennessee. Progressive tax Oregon rounds out the top 10.

In contrast, the list of top losers is filled with progressive tax states. New York is the worst in the country; it has lost a net $55 billion in AGI to other states since 2010. Illinois, where politicians want to join the ranks of progressive-tax states, is next with a net loss of over $34 billion. Progressive tax California, New Jersey, Connecticut and Ohio are next. Flat tax states Massachusetts and Pennsylvania along with progressive Maryland and Virginia round out the top ten losers.

The gains and losses states have experienced since 2010 aren’t trivial. Winning states have, on average, seen net AGI gains from other states equal to 10 percent of their 2010 base AGI. Once again, Florida takes the top spot with an in-migration gain equivalent to 20 percent of its 2010 AGI. Progressive tax South Carolina is next with a gain of 16.1 percent, followed by Texas with 15.7 percent.

Illinois, meanwhile, lost the equivalent of 10 percent of its 2010 AGI to other states, the 2nd-worst loss in the nation behind Alaska.

What all this shows is that progressive tax states, if they’re attractive in other ways, can still win people and their incomes. And it shows that a flat tax state like Illinois can lose people if it’s corrupt, mismanaged and financially crippled.

So no, taxes aren’t everything. But add a progressive tax scheme to the nation’s most mismanaged, most-indebted, near-junk-rated and highest taxing state in the country and you’re asking for trouble.

Just follow the money.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/progressive-tax-states-lose-people-income-flat-and-zero-income-tax-states

June 17, 2020

Tax Migration

Progressive Tax States Lose People, Income To Flat And Zero Income Tax States

Submitted by Ted Dabrowski and John Klingner via Wirepoints.org,

Flat and no-income tax states, as a group, are beating out progressive tax states in the contest for people and their incomes, according to the last decade of IRS migration data analyzed by Wirepoints.

The nation’s seventeen flat and no income tax states won a net 1.9 million residents and $120 billion in Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) from progressive tax states during the 2000-2018 period. That’s nearly a 4 percent AGI gain for the flat and no income tax states, based on their 2010 base of $3.3 trillion in AGI. A table with the individual winners and losers over the time period is provided below.

The net gains in AGI not only bolster the tax base the year in which they come in, but they also help all subsequent years. The gains pile up on top of each other, year after year.

That means the country’s flat and zero income tax states, as a group, have accumulated $490 billion in AGI since 2010 from the nation’s progressive tax states, adding vibrancy, investment and tax revenues to the winning states.

States don’t change their income tax schemes often, so when they do, it’s a big deal. The change pits those who favor progressive taxes against those who want a flat tax or no income tax at all. Eight states don’t tax income at all in the U.S., while ten states have flat income taxes. Thirty-two states have some form of a progressive tax scheme.

Connecticut was the last state to move to a progressive tax structure in 1996, while North Carolina (2013) and Kentucky (2018) changed to a flat tax more recently.

Now some Illinois politicians want to abandon the state’s flat tax in favor of a progressive income tax. They argue, among other things, that higher taxes will bring more stability and people to the state.

But the movement of people and wealth across the country tells a different story.

The accumulated pattern over the past nine years is pretty clear. People are moving from progressive tax states to flat and zero income tax states. Of course, people move for a whole host of other reasons beside taxes: jobs, housing, family, weather, retirement, corruption, etc. Taxes are only one reason. But for many people, they are a big one.

The wealth accumulation by the flat and zero-income tax states is all the more impressive considering there were just 17 such states (not including Kentucky) compared to 33 progressive tax states.

Total gains

The $120 billion total is the net transfer between the two groups of states. In terms of individual total wealth gained from migration, zero and flat income tax states make up seven of the top ten winners of net domestic migration.

Florida, a state with no income tax, has been the biggest winner by far. The Sunshine State has gained nearly a million net people and over $95 billion in AGI from other states since 2010.

Zero-tax Texas is up next with a gain of $31 billion in AGI, followed by North Carolina with $16 billion. Two progressive tax states, Arizona and South Carolina are next, then non-progressive Washington, Colorado, Nevada and Tennessee. Progressive tax Oregon rounds out the top 10.

In contrast, the list of top losers is filled with progressive tax states. New York is the worst in the country; it has lost a net $55 billion in AGI to other states since 2010. Illinois, where politicians want to join the ranks of progressive-tax states, is next with a net loss of over $34 billion. Progressive tax California, New Jersey, Connecticut and Ohio are next. Flat tax states Massachusetts and Pennsylvania along with progressive Maryland and Virginia round out the top ten losers.

The gains and losses states have experienced since 2010 aren’t trivial. Winning states have, on average, seen net AGI gains from other states equal to 10 percent of their 2010 base AGI. Once again, Florida takes the top spot with an in-migration gain equivalent to 20 percent of its 2010 AGI. Progressive tax South Carolina is next with a gain of 16.1 percent, followed by Texas with 15.7 percent.

Illinois, meanwhile, lost the equivalent of 10 percent of its 2010 AGI to other states, the 2nd-worst loss in the nation behind Alaska.

What all this shows is that progressive tax states, if they’re attractive in other ways, can still win people and their incomes. And it shows that a flat tax state like Illinois can lose people if it’s corrupt, mismanaged and financially crippled.

So no, taxes aren’t everything. But add a progressive tax scheme to the nation’s most mismanaged, most-indebted, near-junk-rated and highest taxing state in the country and you’re asking for trouble.

Just follow the money.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/progressive-tax-states-lose-people-income-flat-and-zero-income-tax-states

June 16, 2020

Spray Foam Decor

Designers and DIY’ers

We’ve seen an explosion of foam-covered designs across Instagram

You’ve likely seen a mirror covered in chunky spray foam in pastel pink or vivid orange on Instagram lately. Or maybe even an entire bench covered in it. As it turns out, spray-foam decor is becoming one of the biggest trends of the moment, and it’s also one of the easiest and most affordable things to try.

I first saw spray-foam mirrors from the Copenhagen-based designer Anna Thoma, who had been creating massive mirrors with dreamy pink foam lining the edges. (Abigail Campbell, who sells vintage furniture and recently began making foam mirrors, also first saw them on Anna’s account.) But sometime this spring, I also started seeing almost everyone I know with their own decadent foam mirror that they had DIY’ed. Small oval-shaped mirrors rimmed in pink foam, huge square ones covered in orange-hued foam, and others left in the natural off-white hue began framing lots of selfies in my feed.

“I came across a tutorial from Flex Mami and realized just how foolproof they were to DIY,” explains Abigail, who recently began selling the mirrors and donating proceeds to the Minnesota Freedom Fund, Reclaim the Block, Black Visions Collective, The Marsha P. Johnson Institute, Justice for Breonna Taylor, and The Okra Project.

“When I first posted my version of the DIY to stories, I was surprised to see a lot of people reaching out asking if I could make them one,” she says. “It didn’t occur to me that people wouldn’t want to make it themselves. When the Black Lives Matter protests began, related organizations and bailout funds were in desperate need of donations. Since I still had people requesting mirrors, it seemed like a no-brainer to continue foaming a little while longer but give all of the proceeds to the organizations in need the most.”

The fun thing about the foam trend is that you don’t have to be too precise and it’s super-affordable to DIY, yet it still looks like a very original, unique statement piece. Designers and DIY’ers alike have been putting their own touches on each piece too, like painting the foam in ombré hues. Gustaf Westman has even created foam-covered benches.

“I think the appeal was born out of the repopularization, due in large part to social media, of the Ultrafragola mirror and the desire to have a unique piece to frame your mirror selfies,” adds Abigail. “With the price tag coming in nearly 99 percent less than that of the Memphis design piece and people being stuck at home, it’s no surprise it’s been such a popular DIY as of late.”

If you want to give it a go yourself, you’ll just need a mirror (or a piece of furniture, if you’re feeling adventurous) and a can of spray foam, which can be found for under $10 at most home improvement stores. Make sure the area you’re working in is well-ventilated, with open windows. You should also wear protective gloves and a mask. Set up the area by placing the mirror under a large trash bag or tarp and then spray the edges of the mirror (you can test it on a piece of paper to decide how you want to apply) and let it cure for 24 hours. If you want to, you can also add some color with either spray paint or acrylic paint.

Of course, if you’d rather buy one from the experts, there’s no shortage of people making these mirrors. Anna Thoma may just be the originator of this style, but Jude Camden has also started making a variety of mirrors, and stools and Gustaf Westman’s foam benches are next level. So far, we’ve yet to see the trend pop up on the sites of mainstream retailers, but there are a variety of independent designers stocking them. In this case, Instagram is your best bet for finding tutorials and the designers who are making them.

https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/spray-foam-decor-is-having-a-moment-among-designers-and-diyers?mbid=synd_yahoo_rss