Government Regulation
June 18, 2019
List 4 Potential Chinese Tariffs
FYI, here’s a link to the products on List 4:
http://www.tbgfs.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/section-301-list-4-proposed.pdf
June 14, 2019
Plasticizer Studies
EPA Receives Manufacturer Requests for Risk Evaluations Under TSCA Section 6
On May 24, 2019, EPA received manufacturer requests for EPA to conduct risk evaluations of diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP) from ExxonMobil Chemical Company and diisononyl phthalate (DINP) from ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Evonik Corporation, and Teknor Apex, both through the American Chemistry Council’s High Phthalates Panel. Both DIDP and DINP belong to a family of chemicals called phthalates, which are commonly used as plasticizers in the production of plastic and plastic coatings to increase flexibility. They were identified in the 2014 Update to the TSCA Work Plan.
Under section 6(b)(4) of the Toxic Substances Control Act, EPA issued a final rule that established a process for conducting risk evaluations to determine whether a chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment without consideration of costs or other non-risk factors, including an unreasonable risk to potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations, under the conditions of use. The final rule also establishes the process and criteria for manufacturers of a chemical to request an EPA-conducted risk evaluation on the chemical for conditions of use of interest to the manufacturer.
Within 15 business days of receiving a facially complete request (i.e., submission appears to be consistent with rule requirements), EPA must notify the public of receipt of this request under 40 CFR 702.37(e)(2). Within 60 business days of receipt of a facially complete request, EPA will submit for publication the receipt of the request in the Federal Register, open a public docket for the request, and provide no less than 45 calendar days for public comment. The docket will contain the manufacturer request, EPA’s proposed additions of conditions of use, and the basis for those proposed additions. During the public comment period, the public may comment on the request as well as the additional conditions of use EPA is proposing for inclusion. After the comment period closes, the Agency has up to 60 days to either grant or deny the request to conduct a risk evaluation under 40 CFR 702.37(e)(6).
For questions concerning DIDP (EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0435), please contact Eva Cappuccilli at cappuccilli.eva@epa.gov. For questions concerning DINP (EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0436), please contact Darlene Leonard at leonard.darlene@epa.gov.
For more information on Manufacturer Requests: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-
June 14, 2019
Plasticizer Studies
EPA Receives Manufacturer Requests for Risk Evaluations Under TSCA Section 6
On May 24, 2019, EPA received manufacturer requests for EPA to conduct risk evaluations of diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP) from ExxonMobil Chemical Company and diisononyl phthalate (DINP) from ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Evonik Corporation, and Teknor Apex, both through the American Chemistry Council’s High Phthalates Panel. Both DIDP and DINP belong to a family of chemicals called phthalates, which are commonly used as plasticizers in the production of plastic and plastic coatings to increase flexibility. They were identified in the 2014 Update to the TSCA Work Plan.
Under section 6(b)(4) of the Toxic Substances Control Act, EPA issued a final rule that established a process for conducting risk evaluations to determine whether a chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment without consideration of costs or other non-risk factors, including an unreasonable risk to potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations, under the conditions of use. The final rule also establishes the process and criteria for manufacturers of a chemical to request an EPA-conducted risk evaluation on the chemical for conditions of use of interest to the manufacturer.
Within 15 business days of receiving a facially complete request (i.e., submission appears to be consistent with rule requirements), EPA must notify the public of receipt of this request under 40 CFR 702.37(e)(2). Within 60 business days of receipt of a facially complete request, EPA will submit for publication the receipt of the request in the Federal Register, open a public docket for the request, and provide no less than 45 calendar days for public comment. The docket will contain the manufacturer request, EPA’s proposed additions of conditions of use, and the basis for those proposed additions. During the public comment period, the public may comment on the request as well as the additional conditions of use EPA is proposing for inclusion. After the comment period closes, the Agency has up to 60 days to either grant or deny the request to conduct a risk evaluation under 40 CFR 702.37(e)(6).
For questions concerning DIDP (EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0435), please contact Eva Cappuccilli at cappuccilli.eva@epa.gov. For questions concerning DINP (EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0436), please contact Darlene Leonard at leonard.darlene@epa.gov.
For more information on Manufacturer Requests: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-
June 12, 2019
Tariff Impact on Furniture
Furniture manufacturers, retailers eye impact of tariffs
Hassell Franklin doesn’t like tariffs or the effect they have on his business and customers.
But the result, he hopes, will be worthwhile.
“There’s an old adage – it’s difficult to produce gain without pain,” said Franklin, the founder and chairman of Franklin Furniture Corp. in Houston, one of the nation’s largest suppliers of recliners and motion furniture.
President Donald Trump announced last month that the U.S. would levy a 25-percent tariff on another $200 billion of Chinese imports, and a swath of furniture-related components are affected this time.
Franklin supports the Trump administration’s and other economic experts’ view that China has been stealing intellectual property rights and dumping goods in the U.S. market to undercut domestic businesses. And Franklin thinks it’s long past time that something was done to level the playing field.
“But it is painful for the consumer,” Franklin admitted. “A 25-percent increase for manufacturers like us will be passed along to the dealers, and the dealers will have to pass that along to the consumer. I just hope that it will be resolved quickly, but I really think that in the end it will work out. It’s just going to hurt a bit.”
Last year, a 10-percent tariff on steel and aluminum raised costs on components like recliner and sleeper mechanisms, but they were more easily absorbed by manufacturers.
The new tariffs are a different story, and manufacturers won’t be eating all the costs this time.
Northeast Mississippi has long been a manufacturing hub for decades, and making upholstered furniture – sofas, love seats, recliners and chairs covered in fabric and leather – has been a staple of the region’s economy. But during that time, the fabrics used by hundreds of manufacturers has evolved from being domestically sourced to primarily import-sourced.
Furniture manufacturers have had little choice but to buy from overseas as their suppliers have closed their factories in the U.S. Besides fabrics and cut-and-sew kits, other key components used across the furniture industry include fiber, springs, plastic packaging, mechanisms and motors.
Price increases for those components have manufacturers and retailers alike scrambling to figure out their next move.
Lisa Hawkins, owner of Room to Room Furniture in Tupelo, said some vendors are adding tariff surcharges to their shipments. Others are taking a wait-and-see attitude for now.
“Most of our manufacturers are waiting until July 1 to make some major price changes, but in the meantime, some are putting a tariff surcharge, much like they tacked on a fuel surcharge back when gas prices went way up a few years ago,” she said. “Not everybody is doing it yet, but the situation is very fluid. I think they’re scrambling to see what they’re going to do.”
According to a Reuters report last week, some retails and vendors are canceling or pausing orders coming from China, while others are imposing tough new contract terms, rerouting sourcing and discussing ways to share costs with each other.
“Many have gone to Vietnam for sourcing, and that’s been going on for a few years,” Hawkins said.
The U.S. retail furniture industry is valued at some $114 billion, and China has a major role. According to North Carolina-based investment banking and advisory firm Mann, Armistead & Epperson, which has long been a key furniture industry analyst, the U.S. imported $5.7 billion in wood furniture, $5.3 billion in upholstered furniture, $7.2 billion in “metal and other” furniture and almost $1 billion in mattresses from China for residential use. According to the U.S. Trade Representative’s office, China’s impact is even greater, placing the value of furniture and bedding imported from China at $29 billion.
Skipper Holliman, president of HomeStretch Furniture in Nettleton, said his 450-employee factory will, like others, have to absorb whatever costs it can but will also have to pass along those costs.
“The situation is different for everybody because not everybody does the same thing,” he said. Some manufacturers make greater use of components from Southeast Asia outside of China, and many have increased their own cut-and-sew departments to rely less on kits coming from overseas.
Still, the tariffs will eventually have a ripple affect at every point in the industry, trickling down to the consumer.
Like Frankin, however, Mississippi Manufacturers Association president Jay Moon said additional tariffs will do what they’re supposed to do.
“It’s very selective, and by that I mean that if there’s a tariff particular to a given industry, they may be impacted and others are not,” he said. “Some are benefiting, for example, like aluminum and steel producers in the U.S. But agriculture is getting pretty hard hit, and so is furniture production.”
Moon said tariffs and trade wars are nothing new, and this round is really no different.
“The purpose of free trade agreements is to do away with tariffs so we can compete on the basis of quality and price,” he said. “China violates a lot of trade laws and if we continue to allow them to do that and continue to hurt a lot of our companies in the U.S, we’ve got to have a course correction. Is it painful? Sure it is. Does it hurt more companies and people? It does because that’s the nature of selective tariffs. But in the long run, I think our companies will be able to get into the Chinese markets much like they’ve entered our markets, and eventually I think the course correction will lower the tariffs and possibly eliminate them, so we’re better able to compete on the world stage.
“The key is patience … we have to understand there’s going to be some short-term pain, but we can’t have a rogue player in the game. And it’s not just the Chinese, but others who have violated trade agreements. We have to have a level playing field to better compete.”
https://www.djournal.com/news/furniture-manufacturers-retailers-eye-impact-of-tariffs/article_9ce8c46e-56e2-5e33-946b-b27d3bf0840f.html
June 12, 2019
Tariff Impact on Furniture
Furniture manufacturers, retailers eye impact of tariffs
Hassell Franklin doesn’t like tariffs or the effect they have on his business and customers.
But the result, he hopes, will be worthwhile.
“There’s an old adage – it’s difficult to produce gain without pain,” said Franklin, the founder and chairman of Franklin Furniture Corp. in Houston, one of the nation’s largest suppliers of recliners and motion furniture.
President Donald Trump announced last month that the U.S. would levy a 25-percent tariff on another $200 billion of Chinese imports, and a swath of furniture-related components are affected this time.
Franklin supports the Trump administration’s and other economic experts’ view that China has been stealing intellectual property rights and dumping goods in the U.S. market to undercut domestic businesses. And Franklin thinks it’s long past time that something was done to level the playing field.
“But it is painful for the consumer,” Franklin admitted. “A 25-percent increase for manufacturers like us will be passed along to the dealers, and the dealers will have to pass that along to the consumer. I just hope that it will be resolved quickly, but I really think that in the end it will work out. It’s just going to hurt a bit.”
Last year, a 10-percent tariff on steel and aluminum raised costs on components like recliner and sleeper mechanisms, but they were more easily absorbed by manufacturers.
The new tariffs are a different story, and manufacturers won’t be eating all the costs this time.
Northeast Mississippi has long been a manufacturing hub for decades, and making upholstered furniture – sofas, love seats, recliners and chairs covered in fabric and leather – has been a staple of the region’s economy. But during that time, the fabrics used by hundreds of manufacturers has evolved from being domestically sourced to primarily import-sourced.
Furniture manufacturers have had little choice but to buy from overseas as their suppliers have closed their factories in the U.S. Besides fabrics and cut-and-sew kits, other key components used across the furniture industry include fiber, springs, plastic packaging, mechanisms and motors.
Price increases for those components have manufacturers and retailers alike scrambling to figure out their next move.
Lisa Hawkins, owner of Room to Room Furniture in Tupelo, said some vendors are adding tariff surcharges to their shipments. Others are taking a wait-and-see attitude for now.
“Most of our manufacturers are waiting until July 1 to make some major price changes, but in the meantime, some are putting a tariff surcharge, much like they tacked on a fuel surcharge back when gas prices went way up a few years ago,” she said. “Not everybody is doing it yet, but the situation is very fluid. I think they’re scrambling to see what they’re going to do.”
According to a Reuters report last week, some retails and vendors are canceling or pausing orders coming from China, while others are imposing tough new contract terms, rerouting sourcing and discussing ways to share costs with each other.
“Many have gone to Vietnam for sourcing, and that’s been going on for a few years,” Hawkins said.
The U.S. retail furniture industry is valued at some $114 billion, and China has a major role. According to North Carolina-based investment banking and advisory firm Mann, Armistead & Epperson, which has long been a key furniture industry analyst, the U.S. imported $5.7 billion in wood furniture, $5.3 billion in upholstered furniture, $7.2 billion in “metal and other” furniture and almost $1 billion in mattresses from China for residential use. According to the U.S. Trade Representative’s office, China’s impact is even greater, placing the value of furniture and bedding imported from China at $29 billion.
Skipper Holliman, president of HomeStretch Furniture in Nettleton, said his 450-employee factory will, like others, have to absorb whatever costs it can but will also have to pass along those costs.
“The situation is different for everybody because not everybody does the same thing,” he said. Some manufacturers make greater use of components from Southeast Asia outside of China, and many have increased their own cut-and-sew departments to rely less on kits coming from overseas.
Still, the tariffs will eventually have a ripple affect at every point in the industry, trickling down to the consumer.
Like Frankin, however, Mississippi Manufacturers Association president Jay Moon said additional tariffs will do what they’re supposed to do.
“It’s very selective, and by that I mean that if there’s a tariff particular to a given industry, they may be impacted and others are not,” he said. “Some are benefiting, for example, like aluminum and steel producers in the U.S. But agriculture is getting pretty hard hit, and so is furniture production.”
Moon said tariffs and trade wars are nothing new, and this round is really no different.
“The purpose of free trade agreements is to do away with tariffs so we can compete on the basis of quality and price,” he said. “China violates a lot of trade laws and if we continue to allow them to do that and continue to hurt a lot of our companies in the U.S, we’ve got to have a course correction. Is it painful? Sure it is. Does it hurt more companies and people? It does because that’s the nature of selective tariffs. But in the long run, I think our companies will be able to get into the Chinese markets much like they’ve entered our markets, and eventually I think the course correction will lower the tariffs and possibly eliminate them, so we’re better able to compete on the world stage.
“The key is patience … we have to understand there’s going to be some short-term pain, but we can’t have a rogue player in the game. And it’s not just the Chinese, but others who have violated trade agreements. We have to have a level playing field to better compete.”
https://www.djournal.com/news/furniture-manufacturers-retailers-eye-impact-of-tariffs/article_9ce8c46e-56e2-5e33-946b-b27d3bf0840f.html
