HOUSTON (ICIS)–US chemical distributors would face a cost increase of $1.277bn if the country moves forward with its third round of tariffs on imports from China, according to a trade group that represents the industry.

John Dunham & Associates had conducted an analysis of this third round of proposed tariffs on behalf of the National Association of Chemical Distributors (NACD).

If enacted, this latest round would impose a 25% tariff on $200bn in products imported from China, as proposed by the US Trade Representative (USTR).

In 2017, the US imported $5.109bn of chemicals and polymers from China, Macau and Hong Kong that would be subject to these tariffs, the study said. These represented 8.7% of the total US imports of these products.

Once freight and insurance charges are deducted, that would bring the product value of these imports to $4.857bn, the study said.

If a 25% tariff is imposed on this amount, that would represent a price increase of $1.214bn, the study said.

Once the transportation margin is added, that brings the cost to $1.277bn, which would be the increased cost facing chemical distributors, the study said.

The cost of the tariff would lead to a 5.3% increase on the price of chemicals if evenly distributed across the market, the study said. That amounts to an average of $18.69/ton ($20.60/tonne) or $20.69/ton at the purchaser level.

As prices rise, demand will begin to drop, the study said. It estimates that sales could decline by more than 7.22m tons (6.55m tonnes). For chemical distributors, this would represent a decline of 12% in sales.

This dynamic would result in a cascade of effects. As volumes decline, distributors would need fewer truck drivers, clerks and warehouse staff, the study said.

For chemical distributors, more than 5,900 jobs could be lost, the study said. The job losses could rise even higher once businesses that support chemical distributors are included.

The table below summarises the direct effects of the tariffs on chemical distributors as well as on supporting businesses.

“Placing a 25% tariff on hundreds of products NACD members import regularly from China will have a significant and negative impact on their ability to maintain growth and provide high-paying jobs,” according to NACD president, Eric Byer. “While addressing China’s unfair trade practices is an important endeavor, we urge USTR to rethink their approach and use alternative measures to level the playing field without harming America’s job creators.”

Click here to view related stories and content on the US-China trade war landing page.

NEW YORK (ICIS)–As the third round of US-China tariffs looms, China finished plastics products will be in the crosshairs, along with additional US exports of commodity chemicals.

The proposed third round of tariffs, which the US plans to put on an additional $200bn in Chinese imports, and China on $60bn of US imports, raises the stakes in chemicals and plastics.

While the second round on $16bn in imports on both sides already in effect since 23 August impacted around $2.0bn in US chemicals and plastics exports and $2.2bn in China’s, round three targets another $8.8bn in US exports of these products, and $16.3bn in China exports, according to the American Chemistry Council (ACC).

The first round of tariffs from the US and China on $34bn of imports implemented on 5 July did not include chemicals.

The bulk of the US tariffs in the third round target China’s finished plastics products, In round two, about $1.4bn in these exports were put under tariff. In round three this jumps to $5.8bn, according to an ICIS analysis of 2017 US International Trade Commission (USITC) statistics.

The products under tariff in rounds two and three include everything from plastic tubes, pipes and hoses, plates, sheets, films, containers, bags and sacks, lids and caps, to  wall, ceiling and floor coverings, and gloves and ponchos.

In volumes, for the finished plastics products where China exports to the US are measured in kilograms, the second round captured 128,000 tonnes while this amount more than doubles to 284,000 tonnes in the third round. This could diminish China’s overall demand for polymer resins.

If the third round of tariffs are implemented, the combined impact on $7.2bn of finished plastics from China to the US will represent about 30% of US imports of these specific products under tariff, and 19% of US imports of all finished plastics products, including many not under tariff.

BULK CHEMICALS IMPACT
In the second round of China’s retaliatory tariffs already in effect, the US bulk chemicals and polymers most impacted in terms of trade volumes to China are ethylene dichloride (EDC), styrene, high density polyethylene (HDPE), linear low density PE (LLDPE), monoethylene glycol (MEG) and polypropylene (PP) in that order, according to an analysis of trade statistics in the ICIS Supply and Demand Database.

In contrast, the impact of US tariffs on China’s commodity chemicals and polymers exports to the US are minimal in the second round at under 10,000 tonnes per product in 2017. This compares to US exports to China of 371,000 tonnes of EDC and almost 500,000 tonnes of HDPE and LLDPE combined last year.

In round three, US exports to China most impacted in terms of volume would be paraxylene (PX), ethylbenzene and methanol. But the overall impact on commodity chemicals would be less than in the second round.

For China bulk chemical exports to the US, the third round would be somewhat more impactful than the second round, but still relatively minimal. Notable products affected would include acrylic acid, acrylates, acetic acid, toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).

While methanol would be the largest China chemical export to the US under tariff in round three by volume, the US and China shipped more or less an equal amount of methanol to each other last year.

US LOCAL MARKET IMPACT
Even if overall volumes of bulk chemicals from China to the US under tariff are relatively small, it can have a significant impact on US buyers of these chemicals.

For example, US imports of around 5,800 tonnes of butyl acetate (butac) from China in 2017 represented 67% of total butac imports. US imports of 10,700 tonnes of acrylic acid and 10,500 tonnes of TDI from China were 23% and 22% of total imports, respectively.

And of course, there are plenty of specialty chemicals and materials impacted by the tariffs. For example, proposed US tariffs on China rare earths in the third round pose a problem for producers of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts.

The ACC is increasingly concerned about potential escalation in the US-China trade war, and is seeking certain exemptions for its members through the Miscellaneous Tariff Act Bill of 2018 which would reduce or eliminate tariffs on products not made in the US.

This bipartisan legislation passed the House of Representatives and was previously amended in the Senate.

“US manufacturers often rely on inputs that are not available or made in the US to create products that cost less, yet perform at the high level our downstream customers have come to expect from us,” said the ACC in a 4 September statement.

“Tariffs unnecessarily raise the costs of those inputs, deter innovation and economic growth, and ultimately weaken our country’s competitive advantage. Eliminating tariffs just makes good economic sense,” it added.

Contributions from Al Greenwood and Fanny Zhang

For more coverage of the US-China trade war, visit our ICIS landing page on this topic  

By Joseph Chang

NEW YORK (ICIS)–As the third round of US-China tariffs looms, China finished plastics products will be in the crosshairs, along with additional US exports of commodity chemicals.

The proposed third round of tariffs, which the US plans to put on an additional $200bn in Chinese imports, and China on $60bn of US imports, raises the stakes in chemicals and plastics.

While the second round on $16bn in imports on both sides already in effect since 23 August impacted around $2.0bn in US chemicals and plastics exports and $2.2bn in China’s, round three targets another $8.8bn in US exports of these products, and $16.3bn in China exports, according to the American Chemistry Council (ACC).

The first round of tariffs from the US and China on $34bn of imports implemented on 5 July did not include chemicals.

The bulk of the US tariffs in the third round target China’s finished plastics products, In round two, about $1.4bn in these exports were put under tariff. In round three this jumps to $5.8bn, according to an ICIS analysis of 2017 US International Trade Commission (USITC) statistics.

The products under tariff in rounds two and three include everything from plastic tubes, pipes and hoses, plates, sheets, films, containers, bags and sacks, lids and caps, to  wall, ceiling and floor coverings, and gloves and ponchos.

In volumes, for the finished plastics products where China exports to the US are measured in kilograms, the second round captured 128,000 tonnes while this amount more than doubles to 284,000 tonnes in the third round. This could diminish China’s overall demand for polymer resins.

If the third round of tariffs are implemented, the combined impact on $7.2bn of finished plastics from China to the US will represent about 30% of US imports of these specific products under tariff, and 19% of US imports of all finished plastics products, including many not under tariff.

BULK CHEMICALS IMPACT
In the second round of China’s retaliatory tariffs already in effect, the US bulk chemicals and polymers most impacted in terms of trade volumes to China are ethylene dichloride (EDC), styrene, high density polyethylene (HDPE), linear low density PE (LLDPE), monoethylene glycol (MEG) and polypropylene (PP) in that order, according to an analysis of trade statistics in the ICIS Supply and Demand Database.

In contrast, the impact of US tariffs on China’s commodity chemicals and polymers exports to the US are minimal in the second round at under 10,000 tonnes per product in 2017. This compares to US exports to China of 371,000 tonnes of EDC and almost 500,000 tonnes of HDPE and LLDPE combined last year.

In round three, US exports to China most impacted in terms of volume would be paraxylene (PX), ethylbenzene and methanol. But the overall impact on commodity chemicals would be less than in the second round.

For China bulk chemical exports to the US, the third round would be somewhat more impactful than the second round, but still relatively minimal. Notable products affected would include acrylic acid, acrylates, acetic acid, toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).

While methanol would be the largest China chemical export to the US under tariff in round three by volume, the US and China shipped more or less an equal amount of methanol to each other last year.

US LOCAL MARKET IMPACT
Even if overall volumes of bulk chemicals from China to the US under tariff are relatively small, it can have a significant impact on US buyers of these chemicals.

For example, US imports of around 5,800 tonnes of butyl acetate (butac) from China in 2017 represented 67% of total butac imports. US imports of 10,700 tonnes of acrylic acid and 10,500 tonnes of TDI from China were 23% and 22% of total imports, respectively.

And of course, there are plenty of specialty chemicals and materials impacted by the tariffs. For example, proposed US tariffs on China rare earths in the third round pose a problem for producers of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts.

The ACC is increasingly concerned about potential escalation in the US-China trade war, and is seeking certain exemptions for its members through the Miscellaneous Tariff Act Bill of 2018 which would reduce or eliminate tariffs on products not made in the US.

This bipartisan legislation passed the House of Representatives and was previously amended in the Senate.

“US manufacturers often rely on inputs that are not available or made in the US to create products that cost less, yet perform at the high level our downstream customers have come to expect from us,” said the ACC in a 4 September statement.

“Tariffs unnecessarily raise the costs of those inputs, deter innovation and economic growth, and ultimately weaken our country’s competitive advantage. Eliminating tariffs just makes good economic sense,” it added.

Contributions from Al Greenwood and Fanny Zhang

For more coverage of the US-China trade war, visit our ICIS landing page on this topic  

By Joseph Chang